Brad Menezes is CEO and Co-founder of Superblocks, uniting engineers, business teams, and IT to build secure internal apps together.
AI and low-code platforms are fundamentally changing how internal software gets built. With natural language prompting and drag-and-drop UIs, business users across sales, operations and finance are now developing their own tools. They’re automating reports, designing workflows and prototyping apps without writing traditional code or relying on engineering teams.
This shift, otherwise known as “vibe coding,” marks a powerful democratization of software development. It brings speed, creativity and autonomy closer to the end users. But it also introduces a new organizational challenge: the “last mile” of vibe coding. This final step, defined as the critical transition from prototype to a secure, scalable and production-ready system, is where many enterprises begin to stumble.
Vibe Coding Has A Blind Spot
Vibe coding thrives on speed. It enables domain experts to automate workflows, prototype solutions and address problems directly. The benefits are clear: faster iteration, broader participation and greater agility across the organization.
But this speed comes with tradeoffs. Many vibe-coded tools are launched without proper safeguards. It’s not uncommon to see missing access controls, exposed credentials, untested logic and a complete lack of observability or IT oversight. The result is a growing presence of “shadow AI” inside the enterprise.
As adoption of these tools accelerates, so does the technical and operational debt. In regulated industries, the consequences can escalate quickly, making the gap between prototype and production not just a technical hurdle but a material business risk. Closing that gap, or the “last mile,” is a strategic imperative.
Bridging The Last Mile Of Vibe Coding
To bridge the gap, organizations must recognize that not all parts of software development require the same level of rigor. Some functions benefit from flexibility and iteration. Others demand strict control and precision.
Successful organizations make this distinction explicit. They design their platforms and processes to support both modes of work, empowering teams to move fast where it’s safe to do so and applying limits where it’s not.
Probabilistic (creative) functions such as interface design, workflow logic and content generation thrive on experimentation. In these areas, agility matters more than exactness, and “close enough” is often good enough.
Deterministic (controlled) functions such as authentication, secrets management, environment configuration and compliance must be predictable, repeatable and secure. Mistakes here lead to legal, operational or reputational consequences.
Structured, scalable systems that can adapt as internal tools evolve can enable both creativity and control. That means focusing on three key areas:
1. Define the transition from prototype to production. There must be a well-defined threshold for when a tool requires engineering oversight and production hardening. Establish internal product maturity stages to guide this transition. Include criteria like security reviews, testing, access control and compliance checkpoints to ensure the right level of rigor at the right time.
2. Provide secure, reusable building blocks. Empower internal builders with access to pre-approved, centrally managed components: API connectors, authentication services, observability tools, UI components and more. These reusable blocks reduce risk while allowing teams to move quickly.
3. Embed governance into the platform. Governance should be native to the development environment. Low-code and AI-assisted platforms must enforce enterprise standards through schema validation, automated testing, architectural linting, role-based access control (RBAC), audit logging and real-time observability. If AI is generating code, it must also help enforce the policies that make that code safe, compliant and maintainable.
As internal software development accelerates outside engineering, leaders must ensure that autonomy doesn’t outpace accountability. What starts as a lightweight tool can quickly become a liability. The question isn’t whether teams are building but whether CIOs and CTOs have the visibility and structure to support their teams at scale.
Conclusion
The future of internal software development isn’t just faster—it’s fundamentally more distributed. Although AI and low-code tools enable teams to build the tools they need, when they need them, they also mark a structural inflection point in how software is created, governed and scaled across the enterprise.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?