Ben Blanquera – VP – AI and Sustainability, Rackspace Technology.
At 2:03 a.m., an AI agent quietly rerouted workloads from a failing cloud cluster before any customer noticed. No alerts pinged an engineer. No dashboards blinked red. By sunrise, business operations continued flawlessly, and no one realized there had ever been a problem.
The hypothetical above is the emerging world of AIOps. Enterprise systems don’t just observe and react; they anticipate, prevent and fix with human-grade accountability. In this new reality, trust is the ultimate service-level agreement (SLA).
As AI takes on more operational decisions shaping customer experiences, financial outcomes and compliance approaches, enterprises face a defining question: Can we trust our systems to act autonomously and explain why?
The New SLA: Trust
By 2026, I believe the most competitive organizations will be those sustaining AI agents while maintaining transparency every step of the way. That’s the essence of the AIOps construct: an autonomous operations layer coupling machine speed with human-level governance. It’s an invisible nervous system allowing enterprises to deploy AI safely at scale.
As enterprises have accelerated their AI experimentation over the past two years, many have hit an invisible wall. Their operational systems were built for human-driven workflows, which are reactive, ticket-based and siloed. When autonomous agents began acting simultaneously, performing tasks such as optimizing cloud resources, approving transactions and deploying code, traditional monitoring couldn’t keep up. Many executives have asked: “How do we know what the AI just did? Can we reverse it? Who is accountable if it fails?”
This trust gap has prevented many pilots from reaching production. Enterprises realized that scaling AI safely requires operational assurance. AIOps helps fill that gap, providing transparency, governance and continuous learning to turn autonomy from a potential liability into a competitive advantage.
The AIOps Construct: Five Foundational Elements
Below are the five foundational elements of AIOps:
1. Unified Observability
You can’t automate what you can’t see. Modern enterprises operate across hybrid clouds, SaaS platforms and edge devices, with each generating massive measurement and analysis streams. Unified observability integrates logs, metrics, traces and events into a single contextual layer enriched with business metadata.
Systems shouldn’t just tell you what failed; they must show why it matters: which customers were affected, which services were impacted, what revenue is at risk and who is responsible for the fix. That context enables predictive modeling, where machine learning identifies early signals of cascading failures and initiates self-correction before impact.
2. Policy-Guarded Autonomy
Autonomy should be earned, not granted overnight. Leading organizations follow a progression from suggest to approve to auto modes. Initially, AI recommends fixes that humans validate, then it executes autonomously within predefined policy bounds. Each success builds confidence and expands authority.
Every action—whether human-approved or self-executed—is logged, auditable and reversible. This earned autonomy model builds internal trust while reducing operational burden, reassuring regulators and customers that AI decisions are explainable and controlled.
3. Cross-Discipline Integration
Traditional operations divided responsibilities among SRE, SecOps and FinOps. AIOps merges them into a single, context-aware fabric. When a vulnerability is detected, remediation logic considers security risk, cost and performance together.
Scaling down underutilized instances might save cost, but if those instances host critical data pipelines, AIOps can evaluate the trade-off and delay action until a safer window opens. This fusion of multiple disciplines ensures optimization never sacrifices compliance or resilience.
4. Closed-Loop Learning
Every incident should make the system smarter. An AIOps approach helps capture not only telemetry data but also response outcomes—what action was taken, whether it was successful and whether follow-up actions occurred. Successful remediations reinforce confidence models; failed ones trigger recalibration.
Over time, this feedback loop codifies the “operational DNA” of the enterprise—hard-earned engineering expertise translated into adaptive runbooks that continuously evolve. The more it operates, the better it understands systems, risks and business context.
5. Trust Metrics
Traditional KPIs—such as mean time to resolution—are no longer enough. Autonomous operations require trust indicators, including explainability scores that measure how clearly AI articulates its reasoning, governance compliance rates that track policy adherence, audit completeness to ensure decisions can be reconstructed and stakeholder confidence indices that gauge executive and regulatory trust.
These metrics can transform AI from a black box into a glass box—transparent, traceable and trustworthy.
Elevating Human Roles
The goal of AIOps shouldn’t be to eliminate human roles; it should elevate them. To ensure that elevation becomes reality and not rhetoric, leaders should, where appropriate, define a deliberate human-in-the-loop progression that shifts teams from reactive work toward policy design, oversight and strategic decision making.
A practical entry point is identifying high-toil, low-risk operational tasks such as log enrichment, alert deduplication and configuration validation. Investing early in upskilling in areas like reliability engineering, event-driven architectures and governance ensures teams are prepared to architect increasingly intelligent operations rather than simply maintain manual ones.
Just as importantly, establishing cross-functional review mechanisms that unite IT, security, finance and compliance creates shared visibility into how autonomy is introduced and governed. This avoids the risks of “autonomy debt”—organizations adopting automation without the observability, controls and SLOs to support it.
In doing so, engineers become reliability architects, designing the rules and policies that govern the operation of autonomous systems. Operations leaders shift from firefighting to foresight. Governance councils evolve to include both technologists and ethicists, ensuring autonomy aligns with corporate values and regulatory expectations. Humans move from first responders to trust designers.
From Efficiency To Integrity
In the past, enterprises treated automation primarily as an efficiency play, focusing their efforts on reducing toil, cutting costs and speeding up response times. In the AI decade, efficiency alone is no longer enough. Integrity will be the differentiator. Creating systems that operate autonomously and prove that they’re doing so ethically, transparently and safely has become more critical than ever.
The 2026 Imperative
I’ve come to see AIOps as not just the control plane for machines but also the trust plane for people. By 2026, it will likely be table stakes. Enterprises that approach this journey strategically can better position themselves for faster incident detection through unified observability, reduction in manual interventions via policy-guarded automation, lower cloud costs from cross-discipline optimization and higher regulatory confidence thanks to explainable decision logs.
Trusted autonomy compounds value, and each cycle of feedback, governance and improvement strengthens both reliability and confidence. Leaders shouldn’t treat AIOps as a monitoring upgrade. Treat it as the foundation of trusted AI. In the years ahead, customers won’t just ask, “Is your service available?” They’ll ask, “Can we trust your AI to run it?”
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?