Meredith Moore is the Founder & CEO of Artisan Financial Strategies LLC. She is fascinated by the interplay between gender, money and power.
In 2025, a clear economic shift is taking place: The Bureau of Labor Statistics shared that over 212,000 women have exited the labor force since January, while 44,000 men entered. That divergence does not happen by accident. Layered on rising child care costs, the rollback of flexibility and a quiet retreat from corporate transparency, this trend threatens to widen wealth gaps for women for decades.
The risk is not ideological; it is structural. Women’s labor participation is one of the strongest indicators of economic growth, and when it falters, household wealth and national productivity follow.
The Numbers Tell The Story
According to Time magazine’s analysis of the above data, between January and August of this year, women’s employment rates fell roughly 2% compared to men’s. Among mothers of young children, participation dropped nearly 3 percentage points in the first half of 2025.
At the same time, the gender pay gap has begun widening again. Economists note that across every racial and educational cohort, there is no group in which women outearn men. Those figures matter because the compounding effects of even short work interruptions—missed 401(k) matches, lost equity vesting and smaller Social Security credits—create lifetime wealth deficits that can reach six figures.
When Women Are The Breadwinners
In 2023, 45% of all mothers were the primary earners for their families, and that number jumped to 69% among Black mothers. That is not supplemental income; it is the family’s core financial engine.
When these earners step back, household vulnerability rises immediately. There is less margin for savings, reduced emergency reserves and greater reliance on high-interest credit during income gaps. For many households, women’s employment is not a “nice to have.” It is the difference between progress and instability.
Earning Power And Interpersonal Dynamics
Women’s income also affects power dynamics between spouses. I have lived on both sides of economic power in a relationship; I wasn’t the primary earner in my first marriage, and I saw how easily financial dependence can become a power imbalance. Decisions were tied to who made more, whose name was on the house and whose income was considered important. Even as I was building my business, there was a quiet message that I wasn’t earning enough to have an equal voice.
That experience stayed with me. In my current marriage, I approached it very differently as the primary breadwinner. My wife wasn’t earning much when we met, but I never wanted her to feel what I had felt. We built a structure of full financial transparency that includes a weekly cash flow meeting, open books and shared decision-making. We make all financial choices as a team, and nothing is hidden. Our household runs based on partnership rather than a balance sheet.
Living both roles shapes how I advise women. Income creates opportunity, and structure and transparency protect long-term wealth—especially when career interruptions or caregiving pressures force hard choices.
The Economic Pressures Behind The Exit
The data shows that the exodus is not driven by preference but by math. Child care costs have surged roughly 29% since 2020, outpacing inflation. In 2024, the national average cost reached $13,128 per child, an all-time high.
At the same time, return-to-office mandates are forcing many working mothers to choose between flexibility and feasibility. Remote and hybrid arrangements had created a fragile equilibrium for dual-income families. Removing them often makes continued participation financially or logistically impossible.
Compounding the challenge, fewer companies are disclosing gender pay data or leadership metrics. When transparency recedes, accountability tends to follow. What is not measured cannot be managed, and that includes equity.
Why It Matters For The Economy
Women’s labor participation fuels GDP, consumer spending and tax revenue. Studies consistently show that nations with higher female employment enjoy stronger and more stable growth. A 2% gap in participation may sound small, but across millions of workers, it represents billions in lost productivity and taxable income.
From a household perspective, those missed earnings echo across decades. Consider a mid-career woman earning $180,000 annually. Two years out of the workforce, without salary growth or 401(k) contributions, can create a 20% to 35% gap in her lifetime wealth trajectory once lost compounding is factored in.
What Employers Can Do Right Now
Forward-thinking employers have an opportunity to reverse the slide. The solutions are not radical; they are practical business decisions that improve retention and performance.
• Treat flexibility as compensation. Quantify hybrid or remote work as part of total rewards, not as a perk.
• Design benefits for resilience. Dependent-care stipends, phased return programs and backup-care options reduce attrition spikes.
• Maintain transparency. Continue publishing pay equity and promotion data even if disclosure is no longer mandated. Investors and employees reward visibility.
Companies that protect flexibility and data integrity do more than retain talent. They strengthen long-term profitability.
What Families Can Do To Build Resilience
While systemic fixes move slowly, households can act immediately. Financial planning can help counter the structural forces eroding women’s wealth.
• Model career pauses. Build reserves that cover six to 12 months of income to weather caregiving or employment transitions.
• Preserve retirement continuity. Contribute to spousal IRAs or use catch-up contributions when possible.
• Re-optimize compensation. Negotiate equity or bonus timing to align with family needs and potential leave windows.
• Do the math on child care. Compare your after-tax take-home pay with local care costs; small tax adjustments or dependent-care FSAs can significantly impact the equation.
These steps do not solve every structural challenge, but they give families agency to mitigate risk while the policy environment evolves.
The Bigger Picture
When 45% of mothers are the breadwinners in their households, women’s employment is not a social issue. It is an economic one. The recent decline in women’s participation, combined with rising care costs and shrinking transparency, signals a wealth challenge we cannot afford to ignore.
Employers that adapt and families that plan proactively will be the ones that preserve financial security through this reversal. Equality aside, it is simply smart economics.
Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?