Susan Parsons is CEO and founder of Parsons Consulting.
We throw around the phrase “soft skills” all the time, but when you stop and ask what it actually means, most people can’t define it. The term gets used so casually that it’s lost any real meaning—and worse, it minimizes the strategic importance of the very capabilities that drive great leadership.
I hear it used frequently in executive circles, and every time I do, I cringe a little. It’s vague, outdated and gendered. “Soft” sounds optional, emotional or somehow secondary to “hard” technical skills. But in reality, these are the skills that determine whether people trust you, follow you and remain loyal through the tough times.
Bottom line—language matters. The words we use shape how we lead. When we reach for imprecise labels, we create lazy feedback, limit growth and overlook what organizations actually need most: leaders who know how to connect, communicate and inspire teams.
Outdated Language
The term “soft skills” persists because it’s convenient. Technical requirements are concrete and measurable. Human work, on the other hand, takes nuance, vocabulary and courage to define the ambiguous. When stakes are high and time is short, leaders default to what’s easy to measure: the numbers. That habit trains organizations to treat relational skills as add-ons rather than core competencies.
There’s also avoidance at play. Addressing an individual’s deficiencies in the relational realms of communication, emotional intelligence or social awareness (just to name a few) can feel too personal—even risky. Without shared language, leaders fear being misinterpreted, so they stay vague. The label “soft skills” becomes a catch-all that hides what they’re really asking for—and the person receiving feedback walks away unclear about what to improve. Ambiguity becomes a safe hiding place, but it comes at a cost in the form of tension, uncertainty and a lack of individual and organizational progress.
And yes, the term carries gendered baggage. “Soft” has long been coded as feminine and therefore somehow lesser. Many leaders have been rewarded for command and control rather than connection and coaching. That bias shows up in who gets promoted, who gets labeled “strong,” and whose leadership style is seen as effective. The result: Traits like empathy or humility are treated as “nice to have.” That mindset is outdated. Modern leadership runs on interdependence, influence and trust. Our language should reflect that reality.
What We’re Actually Talking About
If you want to retire “soft skills,” start by naming what you mean. The research—and what I see in my coaching practice—points to five clear categories:
Communication And Interpersonal Skills: How people express ideas, listen, negotiate and collaborate. Includes verbal and written communication, teamwork, empathy, active listening and conflict resolution.
Self-Management And Intrapersonal Skills: How people manage themselves, their time and their emotions. Includes self-awareness, adaptability, resilience, integrity and professionalism.
Critical Thinking And Problem-Solving: How people approach challenges creatively and analytically. Includes reasoning, decision-making, learning agility and innovation.
Leadership And Influence: How people guide, inspire and coordinate others. Includes delegation, coaching, mentoring, persuasion and accountability.
Workplace And Social Awareness: How people read context and culture. Includes cross-functional collaboration, diversity and inclusion, customer orientation and ethical judgment.
The “soft skills” umbrella actually contains five distinct drivers of leadership effectiveness and business performance. Each one deserves its own name and focus—when we collapse them into one vague bucket, we weaken each one. Instead, name the category. Then describe the behavior you want to see.
Great Leaders Make This Pivot
At some point, most leaders hit a career inflection point. The technical skills that once propelled them forward no longer keep them there, and being the smartest person in the room stops working as a growth strategy. The scope expands, teams multiply and success depends on how well you develop and empower other people.
The leaders who make that leap stop competing to be the expert and start facilitating others’ expertise. They go from “know-it-all” to “share-it-all.” That shift takes humility and courage—and it also takes time. Investing in people can feel at odds with efficiency, especially in results-driven cultures.
For many leaders it can feel like slamming on the brakes on the Leadership Highway. They’ve been rewarded for speed and technical mastery in the past, now they’re challenged to slow down and take in the full landscape. When they do make this pivot, trust deepens, teams thrive and long-term influence replaces short-term wins.
As AI and automation advance, this human skill set will only grow more important. We are biologically wired to belong and to connect. Technical skills can’t touch that need—but leadership skills can.
Replace ‘Soft Skills’ With More Meaningful Language
If you want to build stronger leaders, start by dropping the shortcuts and being intentional.
• Retire the label. Replace “soft skills” with the specific category: communication, self-management, problem solving, leadership or social awareness. In job descriptions and performance reviews, describe specific behaviors and skills, not buzzwords.
• Coach leaders to use specifics. “Improve your communication” isn’t feedback. Instead, use specifics, such as “In team meetings, summarize decisions, confirm alignment, and invite dissent.” Encourage scenario-based training to take these specifics from words into action.
• Ask for and give examples. If someone tells you to “work on your soft skills,” ask what they mean, where it shows up and what success looks like.
• Model it at every level. Culture is continuously molded by who we hire, fire and promote and how we speak to one another. Ask whether those actions reflect the kind of leaders you want for the organization today (and tomorrow).
• Make it a business priority, not an HR project. These skills drive engagement, retention and adaptability. Embed them into strategy conversations and leadership development programs, not just engagement surveys that pop up once a year.
That’s how feedback becomes actionable and leadership becomes teachable.
Leaders don’t need a new buzzword to replace “soft skills.” They need clarity, shared vocabulary and the discipline to practice it. Retire “soft skills.” Call them what they are. Define them. Model them. That’s how we turn vague language into measurable leadership.
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?