Unregistered U.S. Citizenship: Hidden Risks For American Born Abroad

Each year, thousands of children are born overseas to one U.S. citizen parent and one non-U.S. parent. Under U.S. immigration law, many of these children are U.S. citizens from birth, provided the American parent satisfies a relatively simple test: at least five years of physical presence in the United States, with two of those years after age 14.

For these families, a U.S. Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) and a U.S. passport are the formal proof of citizenship, but they are not what create it. The child’s citizenship exists automatically by operation of law, even if the parents never visit a U.S. consulate.

And that is where the quiet dilemma begins.

The Choice Not To Register

Many expatriate parents choose not to register their child’s birth with the U.S. Embassy or Consulate. They reason that if they simply don’t document the citizenship, their child can grow up outside the U.S. tax and compliance system. Some even view this as a gift — a way to spare their child the lifelong obligations that come with U.S. citizenship, from annual tax filings to surprising foreign asset reporting.

This is not an idle concern. The United States is one of only two countries in the world that taxes based on citizenship rather than residence. An American living abroad must file annual tax returns and report foreign financial accounts, even with no tax owing. For globally mobile families, that can be a heavy burden.

So, parents sometimes make a quiet decision: Why register at all? Let the child decide later whether to claim that citizenship.

The Legal Reality

From a legal standpoint, however, registration is merely evidence — it doesn’t determine status. The U.S. parent either transmitted citizenship at birth or didn’t. If the statutory physical presence requirement is met, the child is a U.S. citizen from birth, regardless of whether the parents ever obtain a CRBA or passport.

That reality can surface years or decades later, when the individual realizes his “accidental” U.S. citizen status. A child who was never registered may eventually decide to study or work in the United States. At that point, proving citizenship can be surprisingly difficult without early documentation.

Practical Complications

Even beyond the legal niceties, the choice not to register a U.S. citizen child can create unexpected practical problems:

• No Social Security Number. The Social Security Administration requires in-person proof of identity and U.S. citizenship. For a child living abroad, especially one over age 12 who has never been issued a number, obtaining it can be slow and complex. Without an SSN, the child cannot file U.S. tax returns, work legally in the United States, or even invest in U.S. markets. If they do invest in U.S. markets and fill out a Form W-8BEN indicating non-U.S. status, that is not correct. If they know of their U.S. citizenship, it then becomes an issue involving fraud.
• Limited Access to U.S. Services. Many aspects of everyday financial life in the U.S. — college applications, scholarships, or even simple online forms — assume that citizens have an SSN. Reconstructing that paper trail later can be frustrating and costly.
• Cross-Border Paperwork. If the child eventually acknowledges U.S. citizenship, they must catch up on years of missed filings. While the IRS has programs that can mitigate penalties for “non-willful” nonfilers abroad, the process still requires full disclosure and professional guidance.

The Financial Institution Factor

There’s another dimension that’s easy to overlook. While the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act does not require banks to ask about a parent’s citizenship when onboarding an account, FATCA does require them to identify U.S. persons among their clients and report account details to the IRS.

In practice, this can bring the issue to light in subtle ways.

Although banks typically do not ask whether a client’s parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of the client’s birth, compliance regimes such as FATCA and the Common Reporting Standard require detailed client and beneficial-owner scrutiny. In certain cases, for example, when a U.S. citizen parent opens an account and later adds a joint holder or beneficiary the financial institution may review “other parties” in the relationship, which can trigger increased enquiry about U.S. indicia. While there is no requirement to ask about a parent-citizenship question, the risk of ‘linkage’ through a related-party connection cannot be overlooked.

The idea that a U.S. citizen child born abroad can remain permanently invisible to FATCA reporting is, therefore, less certain than many may assume.

The Other Side Of The Argument

Still, there is a reasonable counterpoint. Many families believe it is better to wait until the child is old enough to decide for themselves whether to acknowledge U.S. citizenship.

If the child’s entire life is abroad, they may never have a practical need for U.S. documents. Registering early could impose years of unnecessary tax filings and compliance burdens for no real benefit.

For those living in countries that discourage dual citizenship, it can also be politically or socially awkward to document U.S. nationality. By delaying, parents feel they are preserving the child’s future autonomy.

A Personal Decision, Not A Legal Loophole

There’s no one right answer; there are only trade-offs. Failing to register a child born abroad to a U.S. parent is not a legal loophole that “avoids” U.S. citizenship. It simply delays the inevitable question of whether that citizenship will ever be asserted or proven.

From a legal standpoint, the child’s status exists regardless of paperwork. From a practical standpoint, remaining undocumented can make life easier in the short term but far more complicated later. This is especially so as global financial transparency deepens and expands.

A Shifting Global Landscape

FATCA, the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard, and automated data exchange between tax authorities have changed the privacy calculus. IRC §1471(b)(1)(a) requires foreign financial institutions to implement procedures to “obtain information as is necessary to determine which accounts are United States accounts.” The provision gives financial instititutions such as banks broad discretion in how to meet this obligation, effectively empowering them to ask questions that could reveal a potential U.S. nexus — including, for example, whether a parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of the account holder’s birth. While not specifically mandated, such an inquiry could be justified as part of the institution’s FATCA due diligence to identify U.S. persons. Even if banks don’t currently ask about parental citizenship, the web of cross-referenced data means such connections are harder to conceal.

The decision to register or not now carries long-term implications that go beyond taxes — touching on education, banking, mobility, and identity.

Conclusion

Parents often make this choice with the best of intentions, trying to spare their children from complexity. But the world has changed. Citizenship has become more traceable, and financial systems more interconnected.

Whether registering a U.S. citizen child abroad feels like a burden or a safeguard depends on perspective. But one fact remains: U.S. citizenship, once transmitted, is not a switch that can be quietly turned off. Indeed, it is only one that can be formally renounced later.

In a world where data flows more and more freely, the illusion of remaining unseen may be just that.

Stay on top of tax matters around the globe.

Reach me at vljeker@us-taxes.org

Visit my U.S. tax blog www.us-tax.org