Anna Barnhill, CEO of AdvantEdge Leadership, guides executives to peak performance with tailored coaching and leadership strategies.
Working with senior executives taught me that leaders who advance their careers don’t avoid tough conversations that make everyone else uncomfortable. Instead, they’ve figured out how to turn those moments of conflict into opportunities. I started noticing this pattern early in my work. Some executives would dance around issues for months, letting problems fester.
Others would wade right into the tension and emerge with stronger teams and innovative solutions. What made the difference? That question led me to develop the CATALYST Method. After studying everything from neuroscience research to relationship psychology, and then testing these insights with hundreds of leaders, I found a formula that transforms conflict into confluence.
But first, let’s look at why this matters. HBR found that managers spend 20% of their time dealing with conflict, yet 60% never receive training on handling difficult conversations effectively. The cost? Companies report losing between $420,000 and $62.4 million annually because of inadequate communication. Without these skills, you’re navigating your most critical leadership moments blind. Here’s how to change that pattern:
C: Center your leadership presence.
Your brain doesn’t distinguish between real danger and a heated budget discussion. When it senses a threat, stress hormones flood your system and the parts responsible for creative problem-solving go offline. Get ahead of your biology with a 90-second reset. Use the 4-7-8 breathing pattern: inhale for four counts, hold for seven, exhale for eight.
This activates your parasympathetic nervous system and brings your prefrontal cortex back online. While breathing, mentally frame the conversation around outcomes that serve everyone. Instead of, “I need to tell Jim he screwed up,” shift to, “I want to understand what went wrong and prevent it next time.” Finally, name what you’re feeling. When you label emotions, you reduce amygdala reactivity and regain clarity.
A: Align on shared purpose.
Most difficult conversations fail because people jump straight into disagreements. Before addressing any conflict, create what I call collaborative gravity, a shared force that pulls the conversation toward solutions rather than blame. Instead of, “We need to talk about your performance issues,” try, “I know we both want you to succeed in this role. Can we start there and figure out how to make that happen?” In team meetings, ask, “What outcome would represent a win for everyone?” Or, “Where do we already agree, and how can we build from there?”
I had a client tell me recently, “This sounds simple, but it completely changed how my leadership team handles disagreements. Instead of fighting about budgets, we now start by agreeing that we all want profitable growth. Everything else becomes a conversation about how to get there.”
T: Translate positions into interests.
Most conflicts occur at the surface level of positions (“I want this”) while real solutions lie at the deeper level (“I need this because …”). So, it is critical to move conversations from what people want to why they want it. Ask, “What’s most important to you about this outcome?” or, “If we could address [underlying concern], would that change how you view the options?”
A: Activate psychological safety.
Creating safety requires actively countering what John Gottman calls The Four Horsemen, communication patterns that predict relationship breakdown with high accuracy. Start by replacing criticism with specific observations. Instead of, “You never follow through,” say, “I noticed the project deliverable we agreed on for Tuesday hasn’t arrived yet. Help me understand what’s happening.”
Next, eliminate contempt at all costs. Eye rolls, sarcasm and superiority cues destroy psychological safety instantly. Instead of, “Obviously, you don’t understand how business works,” try, “I think we’re seeing this differently. Walk me through your perspective.” When someone becomes defensive, they’ve shifted into self-protection mode.
Counter it with collaborative inquiry: “You’re right, I may not fully understand the pressures you’re facing. Help me see this from your perspective.” Finally, watch for stonewalling. When someone becomes emotionally flooded, you’ll notice silence, minimal responses or looking away. Create space: “I notice we’re both getting activated. Let’s pause for 10 minutes.”
L: Listen at three levels.
Every difficult conversation operates on three levels, according to Charles Duhigg: practical, emotional and social. Recognizing which dominates determines breakthrough or a breakdown. The practical level is focused on problems and solutions: “What’s this really about?” Your response should match: “Let’s think through the options and their implications.”
On the emotional level, where feelings and concerns drive the conversation, you need to shift: “It sounds like you’re feeling frustrated about the timeline pressure. Is that right?” The deepest level is social and identity-based: “Who are we?” When conversations touch on values, identity or belonging, acknowledge what’s really at stake: “This seems to touch on something important about how you see your role on the team.”
Y: Build yes-and solutions.
This principle turns oppositional thinking into creative problem solving. Instead of “Yes, but …” thinking that shuts down possibilities, “Yes, and …” thinking builds collaborative solutions iteratively, where each person’s contribution becomes a building block for larger solutions. It could sound like: “Yes, you’re right that budget constraints are real, and we need to find creative ways to achieve our goals within those parameters. What if we could address your cost concerns and still move forward with a modified version of this initiative?”
S: Structure clear agreements.
Even brilliant conversations fail without clear, specific agreements. This step ensures that insights translate into measurable action: Who will do what by when? How will we know this is working? When will we reassess?
T: Track and learn.
Reflect after each difficult conversation: What worked? What would you do differently? What themes emerge across multiple conversations? How can you prevent similar issues in the future?
You’ll know the CATALYST Method is working when you approach conversations you once avoided, your team resolves issues faster and departments that operated in silos start collaborating. The leaders who master this are better positioned to unlock innovation and build cultures where difficult conversations fuel progress. Your next difficult conversation is coming. Will you dance around it, or wade in?
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?