One of the many ways that business leaders are adapting to inflation and economic uncertainty is by helping employees with innovative payroll tools. Earned wage access programs— powered by fintech startups like Earnin, DailyPay, and One@Work (formerly Even)— are changing how workers get paid. With EWA tools, employees have the option to access their salary before their scheduled payday. These digital solutions embedded directly into payroll and HR platforms offer millions of hourly employees immediate access to wages they have already earned but not yet received. This shift is fundamentally altering the employer-employee financial relationship and reshaping workforce management.
The trend is so popular that both Indiana and Maryland passed local EWA regulations in May, joining roughly a dozen states that already had their own EWA-specific regulations.
For businesses, EWA is more than a perk. It is a strategic fintech-enabled benefit that drives talent attraction and retention, especially among younger workers who expect real-time control over their pay. As venture capital fuels innovation in on-demand pay and embedded finance, companies must keep pace with these technology-driven trends or risk falling behind. Yet, as EWA grows, questions arise about whether these programs create new debt risks and how regulators nationwide respond.
Why EWA Is Taking Off
According to a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report, more than 7 million workers used EWA services in 2022, moving more than $22 billion in transactions. The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City found that nearly 80% of consumers aged 18 to 44 expect employers to offer such pay flexibility. The appeal is clear: EWA provides liquidity to workers caught between paychecks without pushing them toward costly payday loans that trap borrowers in debt cycles.
For employers, these fintech-enabled solutions provide more than convenience. Integrated via APIs with payroll and financial wellness platforms, EWA reduces employee stress and turnover. Faster wage access helps workers cover expenses promptly and fosters a more stable and productive workforce, delivering measurable return on investment for businesses.
States Split On How To Regulate EWA
Rapid fintech innovation in EWA has outpaced regulators, producing a patchwork of state laws with differing views on whether these programs are loans.
States like Arizona and Montana have issued official opinions stating that fully non-recourse, no-interest EWA products are not loans. These products simply accelerate payment of wages already earned, with providers taking on the risk if repayment fails and without engaging in debt collection or credit reporting.
But the picture changes when providers charge fees. If an EWA product includes fees, especially those resembling finance charges or interest, it risks being reclassified as a loan under state laws. In that scenario, providers almost certainly must obtain licenses and comply with lending regulations, including interest rate caps and consumer protection mandates.
Connecticut’s SB 1396, effective October 1, 2025, reflects this approach by classifying fee-based EWA as small loans subject to licensing, fee caps and disclosure requirements. California’s 2024 regulations similarly treat these transactions as loans subject to disclosure and consumer protections and mandates annual reporting and examinations.
Other states including Nevada, Missouri, Kansas, Wisconsin, South Carolina, Arkansas and Utah have enacted comparable laws mandating licensing, surety bonds, no-cost wage access options, transparent fee and tipping disclosures, bans on interest or late fees and prohibitions on credit score use or debt collection.
Wage Laws And The Early Pay Puzzle
EWA programs must comply with state wage and hour laws that govern when and how employees must be paid. These laws protect workers by restricting unauthorized wage deductions and requiring timely, full payment of wages.
In employer-funded programs, where employers advance wages early, wage laws like California’s require signed employee consent for wage assignments and limit deductions to 50% of wages. Employers must ensure wage advances and deductions comply with these rules to avoid penalties.
Third-party funded programs advance funds independently and recover costs through employee-paid fees or tips. These arrangements generally do not trigger wage deduction laws but may face other regulatory scrutiny (e.g., consumer credit regulations like the Truth in Lending Act, state payday lending laws and money transmitter licensing requirements).
Fees charged by some EWA providers can also raise legal concerns. When fees are deducted directly from employee pay or charged for wage access, regulators may view them as unlawful wage deductions or obstacles to timely payment, increasing scrutiny and risk.
U.S. Regulatory Challenges On The Horizon
Several court cases across the nation are illustrating the risks and regulatory challenges facing EWA providers. This year, the New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against MoneyLion and DailyPay, accusing them of disguising predatory payday lending as EWA. The suit alleges excessive fees resulting in high annual percentage rates, deceptive tipping practices and misleading consumers about the voluntary nature of fees. This high-profile case signals increasing enforcement risk, particularly in states with stringent lending laws.
At the federal level, the regulatory environment for EWA companies remains unsettled. While the CFPB’s 2020 advisory opinion recognized EWA as a non-credit product, a 2024 proposed interpretive rule and a 2025 advisory opinion controversially classified it as credit, creating widespread uncertainty. The CFPB’s recent decision to rescind the 2025 advisory opinion is seen as a positive step, yet federal oversight continues to evolve.
The Regulatory Stakes Of Securitizing Earned Wages
DailyPay’s recent move to securitize earned wage receivables marks a key milestone in the fintech-driven earned wage access market. Securitization means the company pools earned wage receivables and converts them into asset-backed securities sold to investors. This process provides DailyPay with immediate capital to fund more advances and scale its operations. This innovative financing approach reflects growing investor confidence in earned wages as a reliable asset class, enabling scalable growth for on-demand pay solutions.
However, as securitization of earned wages remains a relatively new practice, it raises important questions about consumer protection, transparency, and regulatory oversight. Regulators will need to carefully ensure that employee rights are protected, disclosures remain clear, and the management of these receivables meets rigorous standards.
At the same time, fintech providers like DailyPay must implement robust risk management to address operational, legal, and reputational risks inherent in such complex capital structures. The evolving balance between innovation and regulation will be critical in shaping the future acceptance and sustainable growth of earned wage access financing models.
How Companies Can Manage EWA Risks
Employers must look beyond regulatory compliance to consider the long-term financial health of their workforce. While EWA provides short-term relief from cash flow challenges, fees and tipping practices risk creating debt-like cycles if not carefully managed. Consumer advocates and regulators remain concerned about predatory practices such as default tipping or hidden fees that could undermine EWA’s promise as a financial lifeline.
Best practices include providing clear and upfront disclosures about fees, voluntary tips and repayment terms. Employers should offer no-cost wage access options and monitor employee outcomes to identify potential overuse or financial stress. Integrating EWA within broader financial wellness initiatives promotes greater long-term stability. These strategies reduce regulatory and reputational risk while strengthening the employer-employee compact.
EWA is more than a fintech innovation. It reshapes how workers access and manage their earned income. When designed responsibly, EWA alleviates financial anxiety for millions of workers and fosters healthier workplace relationships. However, if providers and employers fail to navigate the complex regulatory landscape and manage risks effectively, EWA risks becoming another costly form of credit disguised as convenience.