It’s National Library Week. This year’s theme is “Drawn to the Library,” and the American Library Association’s website declares, “Stories and art draw us together, inspiring all of us to discover our own unique talents. Libraries are essential to that process—now more than ever!”
Now more than ever, libraries are also drawing attack. The front page of the ALA newly-released report for 2024 headlines the top ten most challenged books of 2024, and “Censorship by the Numbers.” Inside, the report notes that 72% of book challenges come either from pressure groups and officials who have been swayed by them. ALA also reports that 38% of challenges are made to school libraries and 55% in public libraries.
The United States Naval Academy has just removed 381 books from its library, most either about race, diversity, or gender identity. In Idaho, HB 710 was passed last year, exposing libraries to legal action if they failed to keep children away from “adult access only” book areas. The law forced at least one library to become “adults only” because they lacked the space and facilities to create a separate children’s area.
The trend of reading restrictions is being met by another trend–lawsuits to push back, and in many cases the plaintiffs include major book publishers.
In Florida, parents, authors and six major book publishers have sued state and school district officials over the state’s restriction of any material with “sexual content” without consideration for the work’s literary value; plaintiffs argue this has led to the removal of classic works by Maya Angelou, Leo Tolstoy, Aldous Huxley, and Toni Morrison, among others. The suit argues the restrictions are a violation of the First Amendment, saying, “The right to speak and the right to read are inextricably intertwined. Authors have the right to communicate their ideas to students without undue interference from the government. Students have a corresponding right to receive those ideas.”
Challenges have also been mounted by coalitions of parents, authors and publishers in Iowa and in Idaho, where Donnelly Public Library, the “adults only” library, is part of the suit.
One of the publishers involved in these suits is MacMillan Publishers, whose CEO Jon Yaged spoke to me about the company’s involvement.
Yaged says, “We think we’re fighting for Democracy as well as our business,” and argues that as a society, we get the best results from conversation, which requires the open flow of ideas that books provide.
Yaged sees a problem with laws and local rules that are “very arbitrary,” broad, and vague. “We’ve seen books banned because of a single sentence, or a detail such as two people holding hands.” Details like “a simple kiss on the cheek” do not strike him as “sexual content.” He argues that “you might think differently, but you’ve got to read the book.” The vagueness, he argues, also leads to an awful lot of self-editing, because one doesn’t know what the rules actually prohibit.
While some commenters (like Shirin Ali at The Hill) have argued that banning books actually increases sales, Yaged says that is “absolutely not” the case. “Once in a while a book might get a bump, but by and large it is hurting the sales, especially as these laws start to have a criminal component.”
Yaged noted that many libraries across the country’s many school districts are operating under policies that aren’t even public knowledge. To respond to them is “incredibly time consuming, labor-intensive work, but we have no choice but to do it.”
Why should these publishers get involved in book ban battles across the country? “I think you have no choice,” says Yaged. “It’s part of being a citizen. Reading is a fundamental skill. It’s a foundational skill for being able to function in democracy. You need to have information; you need to be able to analyze that information.”
MacMillan is among the many members of the American Association of Publishers involved in other similar lawsuits to push back on book banning.
National Library Week will include a variety of celebrations “highlighting the valuable role libraries, librarians, and library workers play in transforming lives and strengthening our communities,” but the work defending that work in a court of law will continue well beyond these seven days.