U.S. President Donald Trump has made it clear what he wants: Greenland. But what does Greenland want? And is Trump willing – and able – to give Greenland’s leaders and people what they need to even consider becoming part of the United States?
“We can give the people of Greenland way more money” than “the 60,000 dollars per year per person” they get from the Danish government, Vice President JD Vance said in an interview on Newsmax on Thursday. But money is not the answer to what Greenland wants. And the more Trump and his team insist that the question of Greenland is about money, the harder they make it for themselves to win the Greenlanders over.
Why Greenland Prefers Danish Leaders To Trump
The same day JD Vance offered the Greenlanders ‘way more money’ than the Danish government, Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen held a press conference aboard the Danish Navy inspection ship Vaedderen in Nuuk, Greenland.
Flanked by Greenland’s acting elected head of government Múte Borup Egede on the one side and the newly elected head of government Jens-Frederik Nielsen on the other, Frederiksen spoke directly to the American government in English, saying: “You cannot annex another country, not even with an argument about international security.”
While the Trump team keeps saying that Greenlanders do not want to be part of Denmark, Greenlandic leaders keep standing side by side with Danish leaders, unanimously emphasizing that Trump will not get Greenland. Why is that? Is the Trump team wrong when they say that Greenland wants to be independent of Denmark? No. But they are wrong when they say it has to do with Denmark.
Greenland’s wish for independence has to do with Greenland. Not Denmark. Not the United States. And not China as U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested when he said the Trump administration is “not going to let China come in now and offer them a bunch of money and become dependent on China.” Unlike the Greenlanders, the question of Greenland is never about Greenland for Trump and his team. Money, yes. America’s security, yes. International security, yes, so they say. But Greenland, no.
According to AP News, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen “traveled to the strategically critical Arctic island as U.S. President Donald Trump seeks control of Greenland.” But neither Greenlandic nor Danish leaders think and talk about Greenland as a strategically critical island for the American president to seek control over. Nor do they think and talk about Greenland as JD Vance did when he told Newsmax that Denmark “of course controls Greenland right now.”
For the U.S. government and media, the question of Greenland is about control, specifically whether Denmark or the United States should have control of the island. But for Greenlandic and Danish leaders, it is about Greenland’s past, present, and future, specifically what it takes for Greenland to succeed as an independent country.
What Greenland Wants
“We don’t want to be Americans. No, we don’t want to be Danes. We want to be Greenlanders. And we want our own independence in the future. And we want to build our own country by ourselves,” said Jens-Frederik Nielsen before he was elected as Greenland’s new head of government in March.
Greenland subsequently put action behind Nielsen’s words by forming a new government consisting of four of the five political parties in Greenland’s parliament. Nielsen described the motive for a broad coalition this way:
“This is not the time for political tactics and internal disagreements. The situation for our country is far too serious for that. When someone threatens us, looks down on us or speaks badly of us, we stand together.”
In a joint statement, the Greenlandic leaders said, “We – all party leaders – cannot accept the repeated comments about annexation and control of Greenland.” And when Trump earlier this week said, “We’ll Get Greenland. Yeah, 100%,” Nielsen shared this statement on Facebook (translated from Danish):
“President Trump says that the United States will “get Greenland”. Let me be clear: The United States will not get Greenland. We do not belong to others. We decide our own future. We must not react with fear. We must react with calm, dignity and unity. And it is through these values that we must clearly, distinctly and calmly show the American president that Greenland is ours. That was the case yesterday. That is the case today. And that is the case in the future.”
Not a word about dollars, strategy, security, or control. And not a word about Denmark. Because no matter how much the Trump team would like it to be the case, Greenlanders are not fighting against Denmark. They are fighting for independence.
Why Trump Can’t Afford To Buy Greenland
To give the Greenlanders what they want, Trump would have to do the opposite of what he says he wants: instead of gaining control, he would have to give up the idea of ever controlling Greenland. And he can’t afford that.
As long as the question of Greenland is about money, Trump is in control of both the deal he is trying to cut and the narrative of why Greenland is important for him to ‘get.’ But the moment the question of Greenland is also about the Greenlanders and what they want for their country, Trump is on thin ice.
Trump’s mandate is to ‘Make America Great Again.’ It’s to care about American voters, not Greenlandic, Danish, or European. That’s why Trump needs to be in control of Greenland: because if he is not, and Greenland is not part of the United States, he cannot afford to spend his time – and American taxpayers’ money – on making Greenland part of the ‘Golden Age’ he has promised Americans.
And that’s why the Trump team doesn’t talk about Greenland’s independence, but about Greenland’s independence of Denmark: because the question of independence is dangerous for the Trump team. When JD Vance says, “Yeah, I think they want to be independent from Denmark, and then once they do we can have a conversation about the relationship we will have between the United States and Greenland,” he elegantly omits to get into the independence part. Because if Greenland’s wish for independence is actually about independence, American control of Greenland is just as problematic as Danish. And no amount of U.S. dollars will ever change that.